TEACHER REPORT

Name of Teacher LI WENCONG

Module EC3303-Econometrics I (TUTORIAL)

Academic Year/Sem 2022/2023 - SEM 2

Department ECONOMICS

Faculty ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES

Raters Student

Responded 33

Invited 55

Response Ratio 60%

Note:

Class Size = Invited; Response Size = Responded; Response Rate = Response Ratio

A. GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETING THE REPORT

The teacher evaluation report is for developmental purposes and is meant to help identify strengths and areas for

improvement. Please consider the following recommendations that will aid in interpreting the results:

1. Examine the report by taking note of patterns in order to consider how best to act on the feedback your students

have taken the time to provide. Use the reflection section at the end to reflect upon how you might act on the

feedback.

2. These evaluations stem from student perception and thus constitute one source of evidence among others as to

the quality of your teaching. Any response to the feedback should be based on the most representative results

rather than on outlying responses.

3. Upon getting a general sense as to what has gone well, and which areas may require attention and

improvement, it is important to drill down to the related questions. These questions can help guide future action

if feedback from students suggest areas for improvement.

4. Keep both the likert scale and written comments in mind while reading through the report. High scores (4+)

suggest student consensus indicating a strength. On the other hand, low scores (2-) should be considered as

an area that requires immediate developmental focus based on student feedback.

B. NOMINATION FOR TEACHING AWARDS

Response Count

I would like to nominate LI WENCONG for teaching awards 2

Comment

- Shes ok

- Her teaching style was good

C. STUDENT FEEDBACK SCORES

(i) Rating Score

Question

Average Score

(TEACHER)

Department

Average

(ECONOMICS)

Faculty Average

(ARTS & SOCIAL

SCIENCES)

Mean Standard

Deviation Mean Standard

Deviation

Overall, the teacher is effective. 4.2 0.8 4.3 0.8 4.2 0.8

Question

Average

Score

(TEACHER)

Dept Average

by Activity &

Level

(ECONOMICS-

TUTORIAL

(Level 3000))

Fac

Average by

Activity &

Level

(ARTS &

SOCIAL

SCIENCES-

TUTORIAL

(Level

3000))

Dept Average

by Activity

(ECONOMICS-

TUTORIAL)

Fac

Average by

Activity

(ARTS &

SOCIAL

SCIENCES-

TUTORIAL)

Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

Overall, the teacher is effective. 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3

Overall, the teacher is effective

Question

Average Score

(TEACHER)

Department

Average

(ECONOMICS)

Faculty Average

(ARTS & SOCIAL

SCIENCES)

Mean Standard

Deviation Mean Standard

Deviation

The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.2 0.8 4.3 0.8 4.2 0.8

The teacher provided timely and useful feedback. 4.3 0.8 4.3 0.8 4.2 0.8

The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.2 0.8 4.3 0.9 4.2 0.9

Average of Q1-Q3 4.2 0.8 4.3 -4.2 -

Question

Average

Score

(TEACHER)

Dept Average

by Activity &

Level

(ECONOMICS-

TUTORIAL

(Level 3000))

Fac

Average by

Activity &

Level

(ARTS &

SOCIAL

SCIENCES-

TUTORIAL

(Level

3000))

Dept Average

by Activity

(ECONOMICS-

TUTORIAL)

Fac

Average by

Activity

(ARTS &

SOCIAL

SCIENCES-

TUTORIAL)

Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3

The teacher provided timely and useful feedback. 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3

The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.2

Average of Q1-Q3 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2

(ii) Distribution of Responses and Additional Statistics

1. The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.

Statistics Value

Response Count 33

Mean 4.2

Median 4.0

Mode 4

80th Percentile 5.0

Standard Deviation 0.8

Positive Feedback 85%

2. The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.

Statistics Value

Response Count 33

Mean 4.3

Median 4.0

Mode 5

80th Percentile 5.0

Standard Deviation 0.8

Positive Feedback 88%

3. The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.

Statistics Value

Response Count 33

Mean 4.2

Median 4.0

Mode 4

80th Percentile 5.0

Standard Deviation 0.8

Positive Feedback 82%

4. Overall, the teacher is effective.

Statistics Value

Response Count 33

Mean 4.2

Median 4.0

Mode 4

80th Percentile 5.0

Standard Deviation 0.8

Positive Feedback 82%

(iii) Scale Distribution of Responses

(iv) Rating Scores vs. Gender

Question M F Overall

The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.4 3.9 4.2

The teacher provided timely and useful feedback. 4.6 4.1 4.3

The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.3 3.9 4.2

D. STRENGTHS

What are LI WENCONG's strengths?

Comments

she is kind and understanding, clearing my doubts whenever i email or ask her for consult

Knowledgeable and goes the extra mile to help her students

she is approachable and puts in effort to make sure students understand

She goes through the concepts well and she has an excel sheet for us to indicate our preferences on the questions we want to

present. Making it less stressful for class participation.

Shes ok

explains well

Friendly and approachable

she is very patient and could explain problems and questions very clearly.

Her explanations were clear.

She came in prepared for each tutorial with useful slides.

–

she's very detailed

Patient and willing to explain things without judgement

E. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

What improvements would you suggest to LI WENCONG?

Comments

–

Nothing

NIL

nil

NIL

However, for the STATA part of the tutorial, her expression is not quite understandable and may need further elaboration.

–

More confidence on the subject matter would be nice, some (very few) of my questions went unanswered

F. SELF-REFLECTION

1. When comparing these results to the previous year's results, what areas have shown improvement?

2. What areas remain to be improved and what are the necessary steps / actions to do so?

3. Are there colleagues who could potentially guide me?

4. Are there issues that require departmental or institutional support?